Dynamic Yet Original

Dynamic Originality right? Thoughts around the adjective "dynamic" communicates the possibilities of constant change either in activity or progress. The adjective can also be used to quality a person who is full of energy and new ideas. Consequently, the essence of being "original" as a person has been communicated overtime. 

The rationale centers on being authentic, being natural, unadulterated, which suggests the chances of the obvious opposites such as being fake or a copy cat or unreal. Therefore, the idea lays emphasis on demonstrating a "commendable" level of authenticity as you champion your ideas and create value in any sphere of life. 

However, the concept of dynamic originality at first seems like a contrast of ideas. How can one be original, yet dynamic or vice versa? How can I be authentic, primary with my ideas and intellectual properties, yet remain intentional about gravitating towards change? We live in a world that is driven by change(s); in fact, the dexterity to anticipate change is a proactive skill that will be sought after by employers sooner than envisaged. The ability to optimize value form an idea by making necessary adjustments that allow it to become useful, meaningful, and thrive in an environment that operates differently from its initial conception encapsulates the thought process of "dynamic Originality". 

Adopting a different strategic approach that allow you to attract the right audience without losing grip of your values is a demonstration of dynamic originality. Changing along the lines of value, co-operative yet uncompromising, dynamic, but not unstable, original but not robotic, diplomatic yet not bandwagon driven. 

The words of Albert Einstein shares similar rhetoric "the significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them". Pause and think.